Your cart is currently empty!
| Max Screen Resolution | 7680×4320 Pixels |
|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 20000 MHz |
| Graphics Coprocessor | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
| Chipset Brand | AMD |
| Card Description | Dedicated |
| Graphics Card Ram Size | 16 GB |

•
When Nintendo revealed Metroid Prime 4 Beyond, expectations soared. The franchise had been dormant for years, and fans dreamed of a return to the atmospheric, exploration-heavy, first-person Metroidvania that defined the original Prime trilogy. Add to that the power of the next-generation hardware (Switch 2, presumably) higher fidelity, smoother performance, richer lighting and effects and many assumed we’d get a “Prime 4” that lifted the whole series into a new technical era.
In many ways, Beyond delivers on that promise
So on paper and when you boot up the game Metroid Prime 4 Beyond looks like what many long-time fans hoped for.
Yet beneath the beautiful shell lies a growing body of criticism from reviewers and regular players who argue that Beyond fails not because of technology but because of old and new design choices that clash badly. Some of the recurring complaints:
Where the original Metroid Prime games balanced tight level layouts, environmental storytelling, and thoughtful exploration, Beyond sometimes feels bloated or unfocused. Critics say:
Metroid has always been about mood, isolation, and discovery. Some players believe Beyond sacrifices too much of that spine-chilling tension:
Despite modern hardware, some elements reportedly feel “old-school in the wrong way”:
On launch and shortly after, many players (especially those owning Switch 2) expressed regret
When a game looks amazing but feels mediocre, players react harshly. Beyond’s situation highlights a fundamental tension
As one user comment put it (on a Reddit thread)
“It’s like giving a Ferrari engine to a shopping cart. It looks amazing until you try to steer.”
Metroid Prime 4 Beyond’s mixed reception offers broader lessons
Metroid Prime 4 Beyond is neither a catastrophic failure nor a flawless triumph. It sits somewhere in a challenging middle ground:
a game of contrasts gorgeous in places, frustrating in others.
For newcomers, it may still deliver a powerful, beautiful experience.
For longtime fans, it may feel like a compromise a missed opportunity to reinvigorate what made the original trilogy special.
If Nintendo and its developers take the feedback seriously learn from the mistakes, refine the design in patches or future projects Beyond could end up being a stepping stone toward a reinvented Metroid for the modern age.
But for now, the question remains
Is cutting-edge tech enough when the soul of the game feels hollow?
LTAS OPINIONAs Atlas, here is the grounded, unfiltered perspective

Metroid Prime 4 Beyond is a textbook example of what happens when technical ambition outruns game-design philosophy.
Nintendo clearly poured immense resources into the visual engine the lighting, environmental density, particle effects, creature animation, and biome rendering surpass anything previously seen in the franchise. On a purely technical level, this is the Metroid game fans have dreamed of for decades.
But technology cannot replace the identity of a series.
The original Metroid Prime trilogy had a soul silence, tension, labyrinthine puzzles, and a sense of alien loneliness that shaped every room. Beyond, instead, feels engineered for modern action-FPS audiences. Enemy density is higher, pacing is faster, and exploration is sometimes sacrificed for spectacle.
The tension between modern-game expectations and Metroid’s original DNA creates friction.
It is visually flawless yet spiritually conflicted.
If Nintendo chooses to iterate, patch, and redesign sections based on feedback, Beyond could evolve into a masterpiece. But in its launch state, it stands as a reminder:
“Technical genius without cohesive design becomes noise.”
Because the game prioritizes cinematic set pieces and combat density over slow-burn environmental puzzles. This shift changes the emotional rhythm leaving older fans feeling displaced.
Not always. Unlike classic Prime titles, several regions feel visually rich but mechanically empty, causing players to question whether exploration is still the core mechanic.
The hardware is so powerful that players expected a revolutionary design leap not just better graphics. The mismatch between visual evolution and gameplay stagnation creates disappointment.
Yes. The game’s foundation is strong. Nintendo could address pacing, fast travel spacing, enemy respawn logic, and environmental puzzles through updates.
New players often enjoy the spectacle more they’re not comparing it to the atmospheric precision of the older Prime trilogy.

Select at least 2 products
to compare
Leave a Reply